Blogs and Stories

Kim Masters

The Next Blair Witch?

Indie horror sensation Paranormal Activity was made for $15,000, but broke box office records this weekend. Kim Masters on Hollywood’s haunting hit.

Paranormal Activity is not a small film—it’s a tiny film.

Shot by an Israeli videogame designer named Oren Peli over the course of a couple of years—with unknown actors, in his house—this scary little movie has been attracting the kind of buzz that inevitably leads people to invoke the mother of all cheapo scary movies, The Blair Witch Project. (That 1999 film had a budget of $60,000 and went on to gross a stunning $250 million worldwide.)

It’s remarkable that a major studio—Paramount—is distributing such a tiny film, though that may say as much about the state of Paramount as it does about the movie. What’s also remarkable is that Paranormal Activity has attracted the attention of a Wall Street analyst: On Monday, Rich Greenfield of Pali Research posted an item about the film under the headline, “Scariest Movie of All Time?

The film may not be that, but it sure is off to a great start. Last weekend, it played midnight screenings in 33 locations to sellout crowds. But like many overnight sensations, this one was a few years in the making.

“Jason, I have bad news for you. Steven watched the movie and shut it off halfway through.” This was a little film-executive humor: Spielberg had stopped watching because it was so creepy.

After he finished Paranormal Activity, Peli had managed to get the film screened for horror fans at the 2007 Screamfest Film Festival. That landed him representation at Creative Artists Agency but not much more. Then producer Jason Blum took a look at a DVD of the film that the agency had sent around town.

Formerly co-head of acquisitions at Miramax in the heyday of the Weinstein brothers, Blum had once passed—like just about everybody else—on The Blair Witch Project. And that has haunted him ever since. “What I took away from that experience is—and it sounds like a cliché—is if you see something, if you really believe in it, it doesn’t matter how many people say you’re out of your mind,” Blum says. (Hear my interview with Blum on the public radio show The Business here.)

Blum and his producing partner, Steven Schneider, told CAA they wanted to come on as producers. And Blum came up with a plan: Screen the film in front of an audience, invite a couple of reporters who might write about how great it was, and wait for offers. He invited writers from the Los Angeles Times and Variety, and both wrote admiringly of the film. Nothing happened.

The movie had another shot after it was screened at the Slamdance Film Festival in January 2008. That attracted the attention of DreamWorks executive Ashley Brucks. She got her boss, Adam Goodman, to watch the film and DreamWorks—which then distributed its films through Paramount—acquired it. The idea was to remake it in a slicker and, of course, more costly version.

Here’s where Blum pulled off a wily move: He argued that the writers of this prospective remake should see the original with a recruited audience to get a better feel for the material. Blum says he was convinced if he could get a decision-maker to see the film with an audience, the original version would get released. The March 2008 screening went so well, he says, that in the middle, “I looked over at Oren and we kind of smiled at each other.”

After that, Steven Spielberg saw the movie (on a DVD). Goodman called Blum and said, “Jason, I have bad news for you. Steven watched the movie and shut it off halfway through.” But this was a little film-executive humor: Spielberg had stopped watching because the movie was so creepy. He finished it the next day and sure enough, DreamWorks decided to release the original.

Back to Top
October 6, 2009 | 1:43am
Comments ()
sonofloud

Please just no more movies with hand held cameras like Blair Witch......I can't watch any of those, they make me sea sick.

|
|
Reply
|
9:48 am, Oct 6, 2009
scott1607

That's the first thing I thought when the article referenced Blair Witch. I couldn't finish the film because the camera work gave me a headache and nausea!

|
|
Reply
11:12 am, Oct 6, 2009
Wayfarin

i think you guys are in luck. judging from the trailer, seems like there extensive tripod use. thank goodness.

|
|
Reply
1:38 pm, Oct 6, 2009
bryanlevi

Funny this is the first thing that came up, and I totally agree. It was novel for things like Blair Witch, but has been overused- and wrongly used- way too much in the last few years. One of the worst movies I have ever seen, and I am a major horror movie fan, was last year's "Quarantine," which used handheld pretty much exclusively. It is truly awful & would have been much scarier and more interesting if they had just shot it like a real movie. The idea of being quarantined in an apartment building & being picked off by a monster is sweet, but having some idiot swing the camera around wildly the entire time just absolutely neutralizes the tension and the horror. Stupid.

|
|
Reply
8:44 pm, Oct 6, 2009
Leave a Comment
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
Leave a comment

Please log in to leave comments.

The Next Blair Witch?

by Kim Masters

Info
RSS
Kim Masters
Emails
|
print
Single Page
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |