Blogs and Stories

Benjamin  Sarlin

Battle for the GOP's Soul

Bob McDonnell Steve Helber / AP Photo Republicans will test their strength in Virginia, New Jersey, and New York today. But will the party’s conservative base or the alienated independents prevail? Plus, 6 hot races to watch today.

It’s been a year since the Republican Party was blown out in the 2008 election. On Tuesday, voters will go to the polls in Virginia and New Jersey to choose governors—the first major electoral reality-check since the Obama era began. While the party out of power traditionally makes gains in off-year and midterm elections, the GOP is facing an unusual set of contradictory signals as its rank and file head for the voting booth. How the contradictions are resolved Tuesday may speak volumes about Republicans’ chances for making major gains next year—and even reclaiming the White House in 2012.

On one hand, the GOP’s conservative base is enthusiastic and organized, leading significant protests against the Obama agenda within his first three months and helping to push his approval rating down from the high 60s after his inauguration to an average of about 50 percent today. With top flight Senate candidates entering races in Democratic strongholds like Illinois and Delaware in 2010 and some Republicans even predicting a takeover of the House, what once looked like a disastrous election cycle is an increasing source of excitement for conservatives.

The GOP is “off death row, but it’s still in solitary confinement,” says former Bush strategist Mark McKinnon.

But the GOP’s ability to capitalize on Obama’s vulnerabilities is constrained by the fact that Republicans have managed to become even less popular than they were under President George W. Bush. The party's favorability rating is at its lowest point in the most recent CNN/Opinion Research poll since the Clinton impeachment, with 36 percent of voters expressing positive opinions and 54 percent negative, versus 53 percent positive and 41 percent negative for the Democrats. In an even more historic drop, an anemic 20 percent of American voters identified as Republicans in the latest Washington Post/ABC News poll, the lowest percentage since 1983. The same poll showed Democrats leading 51 percent to 39 percent in a generic congressional ballot, numbers on par with Democratic blowouts in 2006 and 2008 and in line with a broader trend in the polls toward House Democrats after a brief dip over the summer.

The results Tuesday will provide the first real clue as to which narrative is closer to reality. With Republican or conservative candidates holding leads in the polls in Virginia and New York's 23rd District and New Jersey's Democratic governor on the ropes, a clean sweep could go a long way in demonstrating that the GOP can win local races even while the national party's brand remains toxic. The Daily Beast surveyed some of the key factors weighing on the party’s fortunes—Tuesday and on through 2010.

ADVANTAGES:

They’re Not Democrats

With only one-fifth of Americans willing to call themselves Republicans, in theory the party should be dead on arrival in most races. But the numbers are not quite as terrible as they seem: According to University of Virginia political science professor Larry Sabato, although many conservatives have grown disillusioned with the national Republican Party and now identify as independents, individual Republican candidates are ultimately gaining their begrudging support simply because they offer the only opportunity to send a message against the Democratic agenda.

“I'd put it this way: The Republicans are very lucky that America is stuck with the two-party system,” Sabato told The Daily Beast. “The reason they're doing better in specific elections this year and looking toward 2010 is because they're the only real alternative to Democrats.”

But according to Sabato, a sizable number of Republican voters in the 2010 elections may not even want to return the party to power in the House or Senate so much as send a protest vote over whichever issue—health care, jobs, national security—has angered them.

“It's one thing to cut the Democratic margin in the House and Senate as will likely happen, it's quite another to put Republicans back in charge,” he said.

There’s Room for Growth

The Democrats won most of the seats within reach in 2006 and 2008, when they had the wind at their backs. This time around, there are very few new targets of opportunity—and far more territory to defend. This gives the GOP a lot of room for growth. The Republicans’ candidates can also attack the Obama agenda, and blame him for the nation’s ills, without having to sell a platform of their own.

The Base Is Motivated

The Daily Beast's Guide to the Year's 6 Most Crucial Races

The Daily Beast’s John Batchelor: The Last Days of the GOP

The Daily Beast’s Peter Beinart: Why the Democrats Should Lose
The polling for Tuesday’s gubernatorial elections in Virginia and New Jersey so far show conservatives significantly more energized. Democratic complacency after dominating two election cycles could also suppress turnout further while Obama's relative unpopularity among elderly voters, who often vote in disproportionate numbers in midterm elections, could also help Republican candidates. Success in New Jersey and Virginia on Tuesday could also be a confidence-booster, with the party faithful eager for any positive signs.

“[The Republican Party] is still ideologically divided but they have energy and the Democratic side just doesn't,” the CEO of Public Policy Polling, Dean Debnam, told The Daily Beast.

This dynamic has implications beyond the 2009 off-year balloting. In a low-turnout midterm election next year, the more motivated side could overperform.

Back to Top
November 2, 2009 | 11:28pm
Comments ()
Dolmance

I finally heard that wingnut speak tonight on the John Stewart Show. If you close your eyes and listen, it sounds like "Bub," in "Day of the Dead," like a zombie trained to mouth words. A complete imbecile. I hope he wins.

|
|
Reply
|
2:39 am, Nov 3, 2009
squareyellowpaper

Which wingnut?

|
|
Reply
7:57 am, Nov 3, 2009
squareyellowpaper

Obama's success last year will not be repeated. He has lost the attention of young voters. He has failed to continue stimulating enthusiasm in those who supported him. He has distanced himself from liberals. He has failed to champion causes of the working Americans. He has not acted on the hope and change expected by the independents. He appears to have chosen the welfare of big business over the needs of average Americans. His appeal to African-Americans voters was more a vote on the historical significance of the first African-American president rather than a mandate for the man and his politics. When Americans hoped to see jobs created, they were given numbers. When we all voted for Obama the dynamic candidate, we received Obama the timid who acts only with the most extreme of political caution. President Obama lacks leadership and the sense to motivate. He is not at all about change but rather the safest, quietest route to re-election.

The first term of a presidency is a political gamble. President Obama did not lose his populist aura. He never really had one. Perhaps his opponents were right. He is an empty suit: an empty space suit.

|
|
Reply
|
7:56 am, Nov 3, 2009
spittingoutteeth

That's a nice bunch of nonsense that you just spouted there, with no factual or logical evidence to back it up. Congrats!

|
|
Reply
10:55 am, Nov 3, 2009
AlanD2

squareyellowpaper: Minor elections are almost always determined by which base happens to be worked up at the time. And older voters - generally more conservative - tend to have the biggest turnout in off-year elections.

So Republican victories today should be no surprise.

As for Obama being an "empty suit", consider his successes:

-- Legislation Signed --
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Stimulus Bill)
Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Restoration Act
Children's Health Insurance Reauthorization Act (SCHIP)
Christopher and Dana Reeve Paralysis Act
Helping Families Save Their Homes Act
Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure (CARD) Act
Weapons Systems Acquisition Reform Act
Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act

-- Executive Orders --
Reversed Bush Administration policies on stem cell research
Ordered the closure of the prison at Guantanamo Bay

And health care reform is looking pretty certain of passing too. Not exactly the work of an "empty suit", is it.

|
|
Reply
|
5:08 pm, Nov 3, 2009
franjen

Alan:
Please look at who authored the bills SIGNED by President Obama.
Make me out some blank checks on your personal account, and I'll forge your signature all day. Anybody (who is preseindent) can sign legislation.
Sorry, but President Obama's complete lack of experince is so apparent.
By the way, make sure you watch HBO tonight.

|
6:01 pm, Nov 3, 2009
AlanD2

franjen: The stimulus bill - an Obama creation - was one of the most important bills - if not the most important bill - in the last 50 years, as it was instrumental in avoiding America's Great Depression II. Obama will be a great President for this alone.

George W. Bush should be very thankful for Obama's success. He would otherwise be associated with Great Depression II as Herbert Hoover is associated with the Great Depression.

Now it is true that Obama had little to do with writing some of these bills, but as you well know, Presidents always get credit (or blame) for anything that happens during their administration.

|
8:06 pm, Nov 3, 2009
khepri

Obama has squandered his mandate and fulfilled progressive's worst fears. Obama and his cronies need to be sent to the electoral woodshed for a sternly democratic comeuppance. Cross the base and pay the consequences. Funny they didn't figure that out.

|
|
Reply
7:51 pm, Nov 3, 2009
polako1

Oh goodie!! The lunatics are taking over the asylum!!

|
|
Reply
|
8:08 am, Nov 3, 2009
LucieLee

Like "One Flew over the Cuckoo's Nest"! And that would be Pres. Obama who leads unscathed.

|
|
Reply
3:54 pm, Nov 3, 2009
ThinkAgain

What about all the alienated democrats? It's hilarious how the liberal media thinks that ignoring them makes them non-existant.

|
|
Reply
|
8:47 am, Nov 3, 2009
spotted

TA - The D's are used to internal arguments. Nader's group of disaffected voters in 2000 was the reason why the Bush/Gore elected had to be decided by the Supremes.

|
|
Reply
2:29 pm, Nov 3, 2009
opedanderson

TDB is always posting articles about the demise of the Republican party and the conservative movement......

Does anyone really think that they are gone for good?

|
|
Reply
|
9:23 am, Nov 3, 2009
diamondgirl

They only wish the Republicans would go away! But what that dont know is the conservatives are Republicans and Democrats as well...

|
|
Reply
|
1:42 pm, Nov 3, 2009
AlanD2

Have you considered using English in your posts, diamondgirl?

|
5:10 pm, Nov 3, 2009
AlanD2

opedanderson: No. But it will be at least a generation before they are back in power.

|
|
Reply
5:09 pm, Nov 3, 2009
Metrodeco

Now look here, what the Republican Party is failing to realise is how your economic policy over there (in the USA) is affecting small business over here (in the UK). I've blogged about some changes I'm making in my small tea shop: http://tiny.cc/s4tOG

|
|
Reply
10:30 am, Nov 3, 2009
eelstak

I am more disappointed with Congress than I am with our President. I believe he wants to put forth an agenda that would benefit all of us but when he has to deal with congress with obstinate dems as well as republicans it's that much harde to accomplish what he needs to do.

|
|
Reply
11:46 am, Nov 3, 2009
Baddchild

simple question, maybe all the brain surgeon libs on TDB can put their heads together to come up with an answer.

Q: The media keeps telling us how Conservatives, tea parties and Rush are driving moderates and independents away how could they even stand a chance in NJ, VA or NY without them?

|
|
Reply
|
1:24 pm, Nov 3, 2009
spotted

Bad - You're blurring the fiscal conservatives ("RINOs") with the social conservatives ("Bible Thumpers"). The latter are driving the former out of the R party and the RINOs now self-identify as "Independent".

|
|
Reply
|
2:25 pm, Nov 3, 2009
Baddchild

not at all... again, are trying to say that there are so many conservatives that they are competitve in these races? Because we are being told that they are driving them away in droves. Or, is it in fact that they are drawing in moderates and independents otherwise they would be getting their ass kicked today.

|
2:30 pm, Nov 3, 2009
spotted

Bad - What do you think is the current registration rate of the Republican Party? It's running about 28% nationwide. If the registration rate is down, QED people are leaving the party.

That said, there are RINOs who will vote for a Bible Thumper if it means saving tax dollars (VA, NJ).

The battle between the RINOs and the Thumpers is NY 23.

|
2:50 pm, Nov 3, 2009
goldgoose

GOP soul?

|
|
Reply
2:19 pm, Nov 3, 2009
Colonel-Burton

Though I am a Republican and quite proud of it, I am entirely disgusted with it. The move to the right is actually counter-productive as Republicans lost the last election because they were too conservative.

Republicans do not deserve to win this election, and, while it is still a lifetime away in political terms, they do not deserve to win the 2012 Presidential election. I no longer even call it the GOP, as it is a proud name that must be earned and maintained, something the party has failed to do. It is my own humble opinion that a resounding defeate in 2012 will slap some sense into the base and create a drive for moderation. We do not deserve to win unless we can actually offer something, and right now, that is not the case.

The future of the party lies in moderation. People like Eric Cantor and Megan McCain (I know she is not in office, but her moderate stance is inspiring) are the right way to go. Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin are fools and we must rid ourselves of them. They do not speak for me, nor should they speak for the Republican Party.

I say again, I am proud to call myself a Republican, a member of the party of Lincoln, of Teddy, of Eisenhower, and of Reagan. We are can not be the party of No, the party of Limbaugh, the party of Bill O'Reliey, or the Party of Palin. We deserve to lose, but we must learn the lesson we failed to learn in 2008.

|
|
Reply
|
5:23 pm, Nov 3, 2009
AlanD2

Colonel-Burton: I agree with much of your analysis of Republicans.

However, I doubt that a presidential loss in 2012 will turn the party around. My best guess is that it will take losses in 2016 and maybe even 2020 before the party kicks out conservative extremists and moves back toward the center of the political spectrum.

By the way, if Lincoln were alive today, I'm pretty sure he'd be a Democrat. The same with Ike, who almost became a Democrat before finally joining the Republican Party. I think Reagan would be at odds with both Lincoln and Eisenhower.

|
|
Reply
11:50 pm, Nov 3, 2009
Leave a Comment
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
Leave a comment

Please log in to leave comments.

Battle for the GOP's Soul

by Benjamin Sarlin

Info
RSS
Benjamin  Sarlin
Emails
|
print
Single Page
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |